<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Your Newsletter SUCK?</title>
	<link>http://dc-strategic.com/2007/09/28/does-your-newsletter-suck/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: D/C Strategic - Word of Mouth Marketing for Small Businesses - Seattle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sucky Newsletters - Response</title>
		<link>http://dc-strategic.com/2007/09/28/does-your-newsletter-suck/#comment-17391</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dc-strategic.com/2007/09/28/does-your-newsletter-suck/#comment-17391</guid>
					<description>[...] In response to the post, Does Your Newsletter SUCK?, Dennis Didlay and Dani Nordin brought up some excellent points about the nature of sucky versus great marketing. I think though, that it all centers around one of the great marketing fallacies afflicting businesses large and small. And what might that be? It&amp;#8217;s the belief that the more people like your marketing materials (newsletters, ads, taglines, etc), the more they&amp;#8217;ll want to give you money. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In response to the post, Does Your Newsletter SUCK?, Dennis Didlay and Dani Nordin brought up some excellent points about the nature of sucky versus great marketing. I think though, that it all centers around one of the great marketing fallacies afflicting businesses large and small. And what might that be? It&#8217;s the belief that the more people like your marketing materials (newsletters, ads, taglines, etc), the more they&#8217;ll want to give you money. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dani Nordin</title>
		<link>http://dc-strategic.com/2007/09/28/does-your-newsletter-suck/#comment-16966</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dc-strategic.com/2007/09/28/does-your-newsletter-suck/#comment-16966</guid>
					<description>I agree with most of what you say here, except one thing: I'm not in the food industry (I'm a designer/branding specialist), but recipes are part of my business, and something that I'm known for.  I think that there's a lot to be said, especially in the case of sole practitioners who are selling their personality as much as their expertise, for adding a human element to an e-mail that's going to land in peoples' inboxes once a month. Most of the folks I talk to about my newsletter seem to appreciate the fact that, while I share some relevant &quot;businessy&quot; information, I also share a bit of myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of what you say here, except one thing: I&#8217;m not in the food industry (I&#8217;m a designer/branding specialist), but recipes are part of my business, and something that I&#8217;m known for.  I think that there&#8217;s a lot to be said, especially in the case of sole practitioners who are selling their personality as much as their expertise, for adding a human element to an e-mail that&#8217;s going to land in peoples&#8217; inboxes once a month. Most of the folks I talk to about my newsletter seem to appreciate the fact that, while I share some relevant &#8220;businessy&#8221; information, I also share a bit of myself.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dennis Dilday</title>
		<link>http://dc-strategic.com/2007/09/28/does-your-newsletter-suck/#comment-15714</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 18:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dc-strategic.com/2007/09/28/does-your-newsletter-suck/#comment-15714</guid>
					<description>Even good newsletters don\'t always get read: there is only so much time. But a newsletter that comes from a reliable source and has a relevant topic highlighted might even get saved to read later. And if there isn\'t too much of a time crunch it may even get read later.

I have kept my office website in spite of its shortcomings precisely because I get so much positive feedback from patients and others about the monthly newsletters. Many of the articles are brilliant. There\'s a link on my site to the current newsletter, what do you think? Email me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even good newsletters don\&#8217;t always get read: there is only so much time. But a newsletter that comes from a reliable source and has a relevant topic highlighted might even get saved to read later. And if there isn\&#8217;t too much of a time crunch it may even get read later.</p>
<p>I have kept my office website in spite of its shortcomings precisely because I get so much positive feedback from patients and others about the monthly newsletters. Many of the articles are brilliant. There\&#8217;s a link on my site to the current newsletter, what do you think? Email me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
